|Table of Contents|

Evolution and Influencing Factors of Social-Ecological System Resilience in Qinghai Province(PDF)

南京师范大学学报（工程技术版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

Issue:
2023年04期
Page:
67-76
Research Field:
管理科学与工程
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Evolution and Influencing Factors of Social-Ecological System Resilience in Qinghai Province
Author(s):
Bu Shijie1; Tang Chengcai2; 3; Wang Qun1; Zhuoma Cuo4
(1.School of Geography and Tourism,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241002,China)
(2.School of Tourism Sciences,Beijing International Studies University,Beijing 100024,China)
(3.Research Center for Beijing Tourism Development,Beijing 100024,China)
(4.College of Tourism,Qinghai Minzu University,Xining 810007,China)
Keywords:
social-ecological system; resilience; set pair analysis; Qinghai Province
PACS:
F59
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-1292.2023.04.009
Abstract:
The resilience measurement index system of tourism destinations' social,economic,and ecological subsystems are established from the two levels of vulnerability and adaptability,respectively. The set pair analysis method and obstacle degree model are used to explore the temporal changes and influencing factors of the resilience of tourism destinations in Qinghai Province from 2000 to 2021. The results show that:(1)From 2000 to 2021,the level of social-ecological system resilience of tourism destinations in Qinghai Province experienced a development process from low(2000-2002)to medium(2003-2007)to low(2008)to medium(2009-2015)to high(2016-2020)to medium(2021). The change in the resilience level of the system is related to the crisis events in similar years.(2)The vulnerability of the social and economic subsystems is rising,while the vulnerability of the ecological subsystems is declining. The adaptability index of the economic subsystem decreased significantly during 2019-2021,and the adaptability of the other two subsystems showed an overall rising trend. The economic subsystem's vulnerability and adaptability changes are the largest,and the turbulence is the most significant.(3)In terms of resilience,the ecological subsystem has a high starting point but short development momentum,the economic subsystem is most significantly affected by external disturbances,and the social subsystem has a relatively stable development trend.(4)The total number of tourists is the main obstacle to the level of resilience of the system,followed by the ratio of tourists to residents,the unemployment rate,the number of health beds,the area of fenced pastures,and the ratio of social security and employment expenditure to public financial expenditure.

References:

[1]HOLLING C S. Understanding the complexity of economic,ecological and social systems[J]. Ecosystems,2001,4(5):390-405.
[2]张行,陈海,耿甜伟,等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区农户生计恢复力空间分异及影响因素——以陕北米脂县石沟镇为例[J]. 地理与地理信息科学,2020,36(1):100-106.
[3]卜诗洁,马金海,卓玛措,等. 生计恢复力研究进展与启示[J]. 地理与地理信息科学,2021,37(1):74-79.
[4]王群,陆林,杨兴柱. 国外旅游地社会-生态系统恢复力研究进展与启示[J]. 自然资源学报,2014,29(5):894-908.
[5]周鲒琦,王群. 旅游地社会-生态系统研究进展与启示[J]. 四川旅游学院学报,2022(2):72-78.
[6]HALL C M. Island,islandness,vulnerability and resilience[J]. Tourism Recreation Research,2012,37(2):177-181.
[7]SCHERZER S,LUJALA P,RØD J K,et al. A community resilience index for Norway:an adaptation of the Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities(BRIC)[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,2019,36:101107.
[8]刘小茜,裴韬,舒华,等. 基于文献计量学的社会-生态系统恢复力研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展,2019,34(7):765-777.
[9]黄晓军,王博,刘萌萌,等. 社会-生态系统恢复力研究进展——基于CiteSpace的文献计量分析[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(8):3007-3017.
[10]王群. 旅游地社会-生态系统恢复力研究[D]. 芜湖:安徽师范大学,2015.
[11]ARROWSMITH C,INBAKARAN R. Estimating environmental resiliency for the Grampians National Park,Victoria,Australia:a quantitative approach[J]. Tourism Management,2002,23(3):295-309.
[12]CASAGRANDI R,RINALDI S. A theoretical approach to tourism sustainability[J]. Ecology and Society,2002,6(1):13.
[13]RUIZ-BALLESTEROS E. Social-ecological resilience and community-based tourism:an approach from Agua Blanca,Ecuador[J]. Tourism Management,2011,32(3):655-666.
[14]PETROSILLO I,ZURLINI G,GRATO E,et al. Indicating fragility of socio-ecological tourism-based systems[J]. Ecological Indicators,2006,6(1):104-113.
[15]BLANCAS F J,CABALLERO R,GONZáLEZ M,et al. Goal programming synthetic indicators:an application for sustainable tourism in Andalusian coastal counties[J]. Ecological Economics,2010,69(11):2158-2172.
[16]陈娅玲,杨新军. 旅游社会-生态系统及其恢复力研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(11):205-211.
[17]沈苏彦. 恢复力:旅游影响研究的新视角[J]. 商业时代,2012(3):4-7.
[18]郭永锐,张捷,张玉玲. 旅游社区恢复力研究:源起、现状与展望[J]. 旅游学刊,2015,30(5):85-96.
[19]展亚荣,盖美. 滨海旅游地社会-生态系统恢复力测度及协调发展研究[J]. 地域研究与开发,2018,37(5):158-164.
[20]陈娅玲,杨新军. 西藏旅游社会-生态系统恢复力研究[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版),2012,42(5):827-832.
[21]王群,陆林,杨兴柱. 千岛湖社会-生态系统恢复力测度与影响机理[J]. 地理学报,2015,70(5):779-795.
[22]王群,陆林,杨兴柱. 旅游地社会-生态子系统恢复力比较分析——以浙江省淳安县为例[J]. 旅游学刊,2016,31(2):116-126.
[23]叶文丽,杨新军,吴孔森,等. 黄土高原社会-生态系统恢复力时空变化特征与影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理,2022,45(3):912-924.
[24]尚志敏,张绍良,侯湖平,等. 关闭矿山社会生态系统恢复力评价研究:以徐州市大黄山矿区为例[J]. 中国矿业,2019,28(3):58-65.
[25]高彬. 引入未确知测度方法的旅游地恢复力测度研究[D]. 杭州:浙江工业大学,2017.
[26]王群,杨万明,朱跃,等. 贫困区旅游地社会-生态系统恢复力时空分异研究——以安徽境内大别山区12个贫困县(市)为例[J]. 地理科学,2021,41(6):1030-1038.
[27]张甜,周宝同,廖和平,等. 重庆市乡村社会-生态系统恢复力测度与提升路径研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版),2022,44(11):1-12.
[28]DUBE K,NHAMO G. Vulnerability of nature-based tourism to climate variability and change:case of Kariba Resort Town,Zimbabwe[J]. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism,2020,29:100281.
[29]赵克勤. 集对分析及其初步应用[M]. 杭州:浙江科技出版社,2000:4-8.
[30]陆添超,康凯. 熵值法和层次分析法在权重确定中的应用[J]. 电脑编程技巧与维护,2009(22):19-20.
[31]李锋. 基于集对分析法(SPA)的中国旅游经济系统脆弱性测度研究[J]. 旅游科学,2013,27(1):15-28.
[32]宋叙言,沈江. 基于主成分分析和集对分析的生态工业园区生态绩效评价研究—以山东省生态工业园区为例[J]. 资源科学,2015,37(3):546-554.
[33]姚成胜,滕毅,黄琳. 中国粮食安全评价指标体系构建及实证分析[J]. 农业工程学报,2015(4):1-10.
[34]青海省统计局. 最新发布第107期:2023年1—10月全省旅游业主要数据[EB/OL].(2023-11-17)[2023-11-19]. http://tjj.qinghai.gov.cn/tjData/newData/202311/t20231117_312486.html.
[35]李观凤,焦华富,王群. 干旱区文化旅游地社会-生态系统恢复力年际变化及影响因素——以甘肃省敦煌市为例[J]. 干旱区地理,2022,45(3):935-945.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-12-15