|Table of Contents|

Analysis on the Spatio-temporal Evolution of the Factors-StructureCoupling Relationship for Chinese Domestic Tourism Flowof Rural Residents in the Early 21st Century(PDF)

南京师范大学学报（工程技术版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

Issue:
2021年04期
Page:
61-71
Research Field:
城乡规划学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Analysis on the Spatio-temporal Evolution of the Factors-StructureCoupling Relationship for Chinese Domestic Tourism Flowof Rural Residents in the Early 21st Century
Author(s):
He Yixiong1; 2; Hao Lisha1; 2; Jin Cheng1; 2
(1.School of Geographical Sciences,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)(2.Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)
Keywords:
domestic tourism flow of rural residents; influencing factors; network structure; coupling relationship; coupling degree model
PACS:
F590.7
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-1292.2021.04.010
Abstract:
Tourism flow embodies the internal connection of the tourism system and is the main research object of tourism geography currently. However,the interaction between the influencing factors and the network structure of tourism flow hasn’t systematically studied,and the research on the domestic tourism flow of rural residents is also insufficient. This paper takes the domestic tourism flow of rural residents as the object,and the provincial administrative region as the research unit,to quantify the coupling relationship between the influencing factors(abbreviated as factors in the following)and the network structure(abbreviated as structure in the following)of tourism flow and its temporal and spatial evolution in the early 21st century,comprehensively using social network analysis and coupling degree model. The results show that:(1)The dominant flow direction of domestic tourism flows for rural residents is from the central and southwestern regions to the eastern regions;(2)Most of the gathering areas have achieved the factors-structure coupling development,while most of the sending areas are still in a state of factors-structure decoupling,which inhibits the rapid growth of the domestic tourist flow for rural residents;(3)Lack of advantageous factors results in factors-structure decoupling for the sending and gathering areas,and improving the disadvantageous factor can help enhance the factors-structure coupling,while as far as the sending and gathering areas with advantageous factors but in the low status of network structure is concerned,it is necessary to promote their network structures to avoid factors-structure decoupling due to structural degradation;(4)Measures should be designed to mainly address the problems of low living standards and low traffic conditions for rural residents in the sending areas,to promote the growth of domestic tourism flow for rural residents and the evolution of flow network structure,in order to achieve the factors-structure coupling development in sending areas.

References:

[1] 王金芳,于佩良. 近十年旅游学科研究现状及未来趋势——基于4种CSSCI期刊的文献计量分析[J]. 湖北文理学院学报,2019,40(11):44-53.
[2]黄震方,侯国林,周年兴,等. 旅游地理学[M]. 大连:东北财经大学出版社,2015.
[3]杨国良,张捷,刘波,等. 旅游流流量位序—规模分布变化及其机理——以四川省为例[J]. 地理研究,2007,26(4):662-672.
[4]王永明,马耀峰,王美霞,等. 上海入境旅游流对长江流域各省区空间场效应研究[J]. 经济地理,2010,30(5):854-858.
[5]章锦河,张捷,刘泽华. 基于旅游场理论的区域旅游空间竞争研究[J]. 地理科学,2005,25(2):248-256.
[6]马耀峰,王冠孝,张佑印. 中国典型区域入境旅游流空间场效应实证研究——以四川省为例[J]. 资源科学,2008,42(11):1747-1753.
[7]卢松,陆林,王莉,等. 古村落旅游客流时间分布特征及其影响因素研究——以世界文化遗产西递、宏村为例[J]. 地理科学,2004(2):250-256.
[8]闫闪闪,梁留科,索志辉,等. 基于大数据的洛阳市旅游流时空分布特征[J]. 经济地理,2017,37(8):216-224.
[9]杨兴柱,顾朝林,王群. 旅游流驱动力系统分析[J]. 地理研究,2011,30(1):23-36.
[10]方远平,谢蔓,毕斗斗,等. 中国入境旅游的空间关联特征及其影响因素探析——基于地理加权回归的视角[J]. 旅游科学,2014,28(3):22-35.
[11]王永明,王美霞,吴殿廷,等. 基于ZINB模型的中国省域间入境旅游流影响因素[J]. 经济地理,2018,38(11):234-240.
[12]阮文奇,张舒宁,郑向敏. 中国游客赴泰旅游流网络结构及其形成机理研究[J]. 世界地理研究,2018,27(4):34-44.
[13]蒋依依,刘祥艳,宋慧林. 出境旅游需求的影响因素——兼论发展中经济体与发达经济体的异同[J]. 旅游学刊,2017,32(1):12-21.
[14]李凌雁,翁钢民. 中国旅游与交通发展耦合性分析及时空格局演变研究[J]. 统计与决策,2020,36(2):62-66.
[15]刘法建,张捷,陈冬冬. 中国入境旅游流网络结构特征及动因研究[J]. 地理学报,2010,65(8):1013-1024.
[16]闫闪闪,靳诚. 基于多源数据的市域旅游流空间网络结构特征——以洛阳市为例[J]. 经济地理,2019,39(8):231-240.
[17]李亚娟,曾红春,李超然,等. 山地民族地区旅游流网络结构及流动方式研究——以恩施州为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(7):1612-1622.
[18]马丽君,肖洋. 典型城市居民国内旅游流网络结构特征[J]. 经济地理,2018,38(2):197-205.
[19]章锦河,张捷,李娜,等. 中国国内旅游流空间场效应分析[J]. 地理研究,2005(2):293-303.
[20]周迪,王雪芹. 中国碳排放效率与产业结构升级的耦合度及耦合路径[J]. 自然资源学报,2019,34(11):2305-2316.
[21]方创琳,崔学刚,梁龙武. 城镇化与生态环境耦合圈理论及耦合器调控[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(12):2529-2546.
[22]曹炳汝,孙巧. 产业集聚与城镇空间格局的耦合关系及时空演化——以长三角区域为例[J]. 地理研究,2019,38(12):3055-3070.
[23]凌常荣. 中国农民旅游研究综述[J]. 学术论坛,2012,35(8):117-124.
[24]陈超,刘家明,马海涛,等. 中国农民跨省旅游网络空间结构研究[J]. 地理学报,2013,68(4):547-558.
[25]陈超,马海涛,陈楠,等. 中国农民旅游流网络重心轨迹的演化[J]. 地理研究,2014,33(7):1306-1314.
[26]余凤龙,黄震方,侯兵. 苏南地区农村居民旅游消费行为的影响路径研究[J]. 旅游学刊,2018,33(8):68-82.
[27]程静静,胡善风,张圆刚,等. 基于粗糙集和层次分析法的农村居民旅游目的地选择研究[J]. 地理科学,2016,36(12):1885-1893.
[28]罗美娟,叶志浩. 广东省农村居民旅游认知与出游偏好分析[J]. 旅游研究,2014,6(1):45-51.
[29]王海江,苏景轩,李欣欣,等. 旅游线路的空间集聚与中国旅游地理分区方案[J]. 经济地理,2020,40(9):213-221.
[30]李山,王铮,钟章奇. 旅游空间相互作用的引力模型及其应用[J]. 地理学报,2012,67(4):526-544.
[31]郭姣姣,杨兆萍,徐晓亮,等. 援疆政策下新疆国内旅游客源市场优化——基于修正的旅游引力模型[J]. 中国科学院大学学报,2021,38(3):360-366.
[32]刘少湃,田纪鹏,陆林. 上海迪士尼在建景区客源市场空间结构预测——旅游引力模型的修正及应用[J]. 地理学报,2016,71(2):304-321.
[33]史可寒. 河南省城市旅游吸引力影响因素探究[J]. 商场现代化,2016,35(24):107-109.
[34]张红贤,游细斌,白伟杉,等. 目的地旅游吸引力测算及相关因素分析[J]. 经济地理,2018,38(7):199-208.
[35]刘军. 整体网分析讲义[M]. 上海:格致出版社,2009.
[36]赵丽娜. 四川省自助旅游流网络结构特征及重心轨迹演变[D]. 成都:四川师范大学,2020.
[37]程雪兰,方叶林,苏雪晴,等. 中国东部沿海5大城市群旅游流网络结构空间分布特征研究[J]. 地理科学进展,2021,40(6):948-957.
[38]庄德林,杨羊,晋盛武,等. 基于战略性新兴产业的长江三角洲城市网络结构演变研究[J]. 地理科学,2017,37(4):546-553.
[39]周李,吴殿廷,虞虎,等. 基于网络游记的城市旅游流网络结构演化研究——以北京市为例[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(2):298-307.
[40]朱喜安,魏国栋. 熵值法中无量纲化方法优良标准的探讨[J]. 统计与决策,2015,31(2):12-15.
[41]逯进,周惠民. 中国省域人力资本与经济增长耦合关系的实证分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2013,30(9):3-19.
[42]刘春林. 耦合度计算的常见错误分析[J]. 淮阴师范学院学报(自然科学版),2017,16(1):18-22.
[43]吴文恒,牛叔文. 甘肃省人口与资源环境耦合的演进分析[J]. 中国人口科学,2006,20(2):81-86.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-12-15