|Table of Contents|

The Dynamic Evolution and Spatial Definition of the Regional Scope of "the Belt and Road Initiative": Ideological and Political Exploration in "Regional Economics"(PDF)

南京师范大学学报（工程技术版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

Issue:
2025年01期
Page:
88-94
Research Field:
新工科研究与实践
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
The Dynamic Evolution and Spatial Definition of the Regional Scope of "the Belt and Road Initiative": Ideological and Political Exploration in "Regional Economics"
Author(s):
Lu Mengqiu1; 2
(1.School of International Economics and Business,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Nanjing 210023,China)
(2.Industry Development Research Institute,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Nanjing 210023,China)
Keywords:
"the Belt and Road Initiative"; regional scope; curriculum-based ideological and political; Regional Economics
PACS:
F08
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-1292.2025.01.010
Abstract:
The coordinated development of "the Belt and Road Initiative" and China’s regional economy is an important topic of "Regional Economics",as well as an important ideological and political component of the "Regional Economics" course. As a concept of dynamic development and organic unity,"the Belt and Road" is not currently defined in the geographical scope. Based on the comprehensive perspectives of economy and trade,history and culture,and transportation network,the paper analyzes the geographical scope of “the Belt and Road Initiative” in different types and periods. Therefore,we attempt to systematically incorporate "the Belt and Road" initiative into ideological and political exploration of the "Regional Economics" course,to respond to the task of ideological and political education,and to cultivate students’ historical and cultural self-confidence,as well as their worldview and sense of social responsibility of “a community with a shared future for mankind”.

References:

[1]杨建云. “区域经济学”课程思政大纲的制定与实现[J]. 黑龙江教育(理论与实践),2021(7):29-31.
[2]桑百川,杨立卓. 拓展我国与“一带一路”国家的贸易关系:基于竞争性与互补性研究[J]. 经济问题,2015(8):1-5.
[3]孙涛,吴琳,王飞,等. 大规模航运数据下“一带一路”国家和地区贸易网络分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报,2018,20(5):593-601.
[4]葛剑雄. “一带一路”的历史被误读[J]. 环境教育,2015(5):53-54.
[5]王志远. “一带一路”的历史地理及其当代价值[J]. 欧亚经济,2016(3):52-64.
[6]周洁. “一带一路”历史文化观再思考:兼谈丝路文化遗产的价值发现与开发传承[J]. 中华文化论坛,2017(11):44-50.
[7]王治来. 丝绸之路的历史文化交流与“一带一路”建设[J]. 西域研究,2017(2):98-106,142.
[8]葛剑雄. 存在与影响:历史上中外文化交流对“一带一路”建设的启示[J]. 思想战线,2016,42(5):1-3.
[9]张象. 论古丝绸之路历史对现实的启示[J]. 安徽史学,2018(3):5-11.
[10]张晓红,詹小美. “一带一路”生成发展的历史逻辑[J]. 广西社会科学,2017(10):149-154.
[11]袁黎明. 唐代丝绸之路演变与西北市场格局的变动[D]. 西安:陕西师范大学,2010.
[12]马建春. 海上丝绸之路的历史贡献[J]. 社会科学战线,2016(4):81-87.
[13]赵凌飞. “一带一路”史研究综述[J]. 中国社会经济史研究,2018(1):89-102.
[14]王健. “近代丝绸之路”:从“丝绸之路”到“一带一路”历史跨越的重要节点[J]. 南京社会科学,2017(3):144-150.
[15]刘卫东,田锦尘,欧晓理. “一带一路”战略研究[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,2017.
[16]袁剑. 丝绸之路、地方知识与区域秩序:“丝绸之路”的概念、话语及其超越[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,46(4):73-79.
[17]徐波. 中国外交:从历史资源中汲取正能量:对丝绸之路与郑和远航的比较[J]. 中国周边外交学刊,2015(1):108-129.
[18]杨宇,夏四友,钱肖颖. 能源转型的地缘政治研究[J]. 地理学报,2022,77(8):2050-2066.
[19]王义桅. 世界是通的:“一带一路”的逻辑[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,2016.
[20]杜德斌,马亚华. “一带一路”:中华民族复兴的地缘大战略[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(6):1005-1014.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2025-03-15