|Table of Contents|

Design and Implementation of Marine Delimitation Plan EvaluationSystem Based on AHP-entropy Method(PDF)

南京师范大学学报（工程技术版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

Issue:
2021年04期
Page:
40-46
Research Field:
测绘科学与技术
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Design and Implementation of Marine Delimitation Plan EvaluationSystem Based on AHP-entropy Method
Author(s):
Xu Min; Wang Jing; Lai Zhengqing; Du Wen; Wang Lu
School of Marine Science and Engineering,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China
Keywords:
maritime delimitation; evaluation model; analytic hierarchy process(AHP); entropy method; software system
PACS:
P741
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-1292.2021.04.007
Abstract:
Maritime delimitation is the act of dividing the territorial sea,exclusive economic zone and continental shelf boundaries between adjacent or facing countries on the coast. As maritime delimitation is affected by many factors,which are considered differently by different countries involved in the maritime boundary delimitation,the maritime delimitation claims they put forward are also different. As a consequence,quantitatively evaluating the various delimitation schemes proposed under different delimitation claims becomes necessary. Based on the AHP-entropy method,the comprehensive evaluation and decision-making model of marine delimitation plans,this research developes a marine demarcation plan evaluation system. This system includes functions such as evaluation index selection,index weight setting,qualitative index assisted scoring,parameters and results visualization. It realizes the quantitative evaluation of the marine delimitation plan by reading the marine delimitation plan parameters from the marine delimitation GIS system. The comprehensive evaluation model and system of the marine delimitation plan can be used for domestic and foreign marine delimitation decisions. Users can select appropriate indicators from the system to evaluate multiple marine delimitation plans according to the characteristics of the sea area,so as to provide a basis for delimitation plan decision-making.

References:

[1] ?STHAGEN A. Maritime boundary disputes:What are they and why do they matter?[J]. Marine Policy,2020,120:104118.
[2]方威. 浅析国际海洋争端与国际仲裁[J]. 法制与社会,2013(33):111-112.
[3]吴盈盈,孔庆江. 我国与周边国家海洋争端的国际管辖权问题研究[J]. 亚太安全与海洋研究,2019(5):49-64.
[4]江藤淳一,辛崇阳. 有关海洋划界的国际判例的动向[J]. 国际法研究,2019,30(2):23-33.
[5]阮俊杰. 论国际海洋划界中的“灰区”问题[J]. 法制与经济,2018,449(8):178-180.
[6]HASAN M M,JIAN H,ALAM M W,et al. Protracted maritime boundary disputes and maritime laws[J]. Journal of International Maritime Safety,Environmental Affairs,and Shipping,2019,2(2):89-96.
[7]沈文周. 海域划界技术方法[M]. 北京:海洋出版社,2003(4):199.
[8]王玫黎,杜陈洁. 《联合国海洋法公约》下的强制调解制度评析——以中国利益为视角[J]. 太平洋学报,2019,27(8):29-41.
[9]QI H. Maritime delimitation between China and North Korea in the North Yellow Sea[J]. Ocean Development & International Law,2020,51(4):358-385.
[10]LEE S,SCHOFIELD C. The law of the Sea and South Korea:The Challenges of Maritime Boundary Delimitation in the Yellow Sea[J]. Policy,2017,(81):219-8.
[11]张华. 国际海洋划界裁判中的“司法能动主义”——以200海里外大陆架划界问题为例[J]. 外交评论(外交学院学报),2019,36(1):139-160.
[12]LIAO X. Evaluation of scientific evidence by international courts and tribunals in the continental shelf delimitation cases[J]. Ocean Development & International Law,2017,48(2):136-57.
[13]WIBAWA AC,SUPRIYONO B,MULUK M K,et al. Policy evaluation on Maritime Security Issues in Indonesia[J]. Wacana Journal of Social and Humanity Studies,2020,23(3):165-173.
[14]武丽丽,徐青,华一新. 基于六角格的划界方案线资源分配评价方法[J]. 测绘工程,2015,24(12):62-67.
[15]武丽丽,徐青,宋飞杰. 基于六角格的陆地边界区域重要性评价方法[J]. 海洋测绘,2015,35(4):48-51.
[16]李四海,何广顺,金继业,等. 省际海域勘界信息系统的设计与实现[J]. 海洋测绘,2003(5):16-19.
[17]许雪燕. 模糊综合评价模型的研究及应用[D]. 成都:西南石油大学,2011.
[18]章穗,张梅,迟国泰. 基于熵权法的科学技术评价模型及其实证研究[J]. 管理学报,2010,7(1):34.
[19]庄锁法. 基于层次分析法的综合评价模型[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2000,23(4):582-585,590.
[20]丁浩洪. 动态链接库技术的应用探讨[J]. 信息系统工程,2019(1):40.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-12-15