|Table of Contents|

Research Review and Analysis of Evolutionary Trends of Learning Progression at Home and Abroad(PDF)

南京师范大学学报（工程技术版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

Issue:
2025年01期
Page:
78-87
Research Field:
管理科学与工程
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Research Review and Analysis of Evolutionary Trends of Learning Progression at Home and Abroad
Author(s):
Zhang Shuya1; Zhao Yuan2
(1.School of Teacher Education,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)
(2.School of Geography,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)
Keywords:
learning progression; research hotspots; research trends; domestic and international comparison
PACS:
G420
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-1292.2025.01.009
Abstract:
Learning progression has led to the transformation and development of science education in the 21st century,gaining recognition and attention in various disciplinary fields. This article takes the relevant journals on learning progression from CNKI and the Web of Science core database as research samples. Through visual analysis using CiteSpace software,it identifies research hotspots in the field of learning progression both domestically and internationally,analyzes the reasons for differences in research hotspots,and makes predictions about future trends. The study indicates that domestic research on learning progression mainly focuses on core literacy,conceptual development,and teaching practices,while international research primarily centers on different themes of learning progression,breadth expansion,and empirical research. The differences in domestic and international research are mainly attributed to curriculum design,developmental processes,and project policy promotion. The future research trends in the field of learning progression include constructing learning progression that emphasizes key competency cultivation,deepening empirical research on formative assessment of learning progression,advancing its application in teacher professional development and construct disciplinary matrix.

References:

[1]FRATT L. Less is more:Trimming the overstuffed curriculum[J]. District Administrator,2002,38(3):56-60.
[2]美国科学促进协会.美国科学素养的基准[M]. 中国科学技术协会,译.北京:科学普及出版社,2001.
[3]SMITH C,WISER M,ANDERSON C W,et al. Implications of research on children’s learning for assessment:Matter and atomic molecular theory[J]. Measurement:Interdisciplinary Research and Perspective,2006,4(1/2):1-98.
[4]NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. A Framework for K-12 Science Education:Practices,Crosscutting Concept,and Core Idea[EB/OL]. [2024-01-24]. https://www.bowdoin.edu/childrens-center/pdf/A_Framework_for_k12_science.pdf.
[5]陈超美,陈悦,侯剑华,等. CiteSpace Ⅱ:科学文献中新趋势与新动态的识别与可视化[J]. 情报学报,2009,28(3):401-421.
[6]SCHWARZ C V,REISER B J,DAVIS E A,et al. Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling:Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2009,46(6):632-654.
[7]NEUMANN K,VIERING T,BOONE W J,et al. Towards a learning progression of energy[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2013,50(2):162-188.
[8]STEVENS S Y,DELGADO C,KRAJCIK J S. Developing a hypothetical multi-dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2010,47(6):687-715.
[9]高佳利,张静,李小青. 核心概念学习进阶的理论建构及实证研究——以“几何光学”为例[J]. 天津师范大学学报(基础教育版),2017,18(3):60-64.
[10]王锕,玛丽娜·阿西木汗,郭玉英. 基于核心素养学习进阶的“楞次定律”教学改进实证研究[J]. 物理教师,2017,38(12):16-20.
[11]COOPER M,KLYMKOWSKY M. Chemistry,life,the universe,and everything:A new approach to general chemistry,and a model for curriculum reform[J]. Journal of Chemical Education,2013,90(9):1116-1122.
[12]YIN Y,TOMITA M K,SHAVELSON R J. Using formal embedded formative assessments aligned with a short-term learning progression to promote conceptual change and achievement in science[J]. International Journal of Science Education,2014,36(4):531-552.
[13]SMITH C L,WISER M,ANDERSON C W,et al. Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment:A proposed learning progression for matter and the Atomic-Molecular theory[J]. Measurement:Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives,2006,4(1/2):1-98.
[14]CATLEY K,LEHRER R,REISER B. Tracing a prospective learning progression for developing understanding of evolution[R]. Washington DC,USA:National Academy of Sciences,2005.
[15]秦瑜,姜帅,王彩连. 基于CiteSpace的中学地理教师专业发展研究综述与演进趋势分析[J]. 地理教学,2023(19):9-13.
[16]DUSCHL R,MAENG S,SEZEN A. Learning progressions and teaching sequences:A review and analysis[J]. Studies in Science Education,2011,47(2):123-182.
[17]OSBORNE J F,HENDERSON J B,MACPHERSON A,et al. The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2016,53(6):821-846.
[18]SONGER N B,KELCEY B,GOTWALS A W. How and when does complex reasoning occur?Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2009,46(6):610-631.
[19]NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. Taking Science to School:Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8[M]. Washington DC,USA:The National Academies Press,2007.
[20]LEHRER R,SCHAUBLE L. Modeling natural variation through distribution[J]. American Educational Research Journal,2004,41(3):635-679.
[21]MOHAN L,CHEN J,ANDERSON C W. Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2009,46(6):675-698.
[22]REISER B J. Scaffolding complex learning:The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work[J]. Journal of the Learning Sciences,2004,13(3):273-304.
[23]CHEN Y C,BENUS M J,YARKER M B. Using models to support argumentation in the science classroom[J]. The American Biology Teacher,2016,78(7):549-559.
[24]弭乐,郭玉英.概念学习进阶与科学论证整合的教学设计研究[J]. 课程·教材·教法,2018,38(5):90-98.
[25]弭乐,郭玉英. 基于整合的进阶式教学设计研究:以概念进阶与论证进阶为例[J]. 物理教师,2021,42(1):2-7.
[26]CORCORAN T,SILANDER M. Instruction in high schools:The evidence and the challenge[J]. The Future of Children,2009,19(1):157-183.
[27]FURTAK E M,HEREDIA S C. Exploring the influence of learning progressions in two teacher communities[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2014,51(8):982-1020.
[28]ANDERSON C W,DE LOS SANTOS E X,BODBYL S,et al. Designing educational systems to support enactment of the next generation science standards[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2018,55(7):1026-1052.
[29]CARRAHER D W,SMITH C L,WISER M,et al. Assessing students’ evolving understandings about matter[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 Learning Progressions in Science(LeaPS)Conference. Iowa City,USA:LeaPS,2009.
[30]BELL B,COWIE B. Formative Assessment and Science Education[M]. Dordrecht,Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers,2001.
[31]CHOI Y,MCCLENEN C. Development of adaptive formative assessment system using computerized adaptive testing and dynamic Bayesian networks[J]. Applied Sciences,2020,10(22):8196.
[32]GUNCKEL K L,COVITT B A,SALINAS I. Learning progressions as tools for supporting teacher content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge about water in environmental systems[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2018,55(9):1339-1362.
[33]VON AUFSCHNAITER C,ALONZO A C. Foundations of formative assessment:Introducing a learning progression to guide preservice physics teachers’ video-based interpretation of student thinking[J]. Applied Measurement in Education,2018,31(2):113-127.
[34]DUNCAN R G,ROGAT A D,YARDEN A. A learning progression for deepening students’ understandings of modern genetics across the 5th-10th grades[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2009,46(6):655-674.
[35]ALONZO A C,STEEDLE J T. Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression[J]. Science Education,2009,93(3):389-421.
[36]STEEDLE J T,SHAVELSON R J. Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2009,46(6):699-715.
[37]ROSEMAN J E,CALDWELL A,GOGOS A,et al. Maping a coherent learning progression for the molecular basis of heredity[C]//Proceedings of the 2006 National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting. San Francisco,USA:NARST,2006.
[38]SALINAS I. Learning progressions in science education:Two approaches for development[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 Learning Progressions in Science(LeaPS)Conference. Iowa City,USA:LeaPS,2009.
[39]TALANQUER V. On cognitive constraints and learning progressions:The case of “structure of matter”[J]. International Journal of Science Education,2009,31(15):2123-2136.
[40]LEE H S,LIU O L. Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades:The knowledge integration perspective[J]. Science Education,2010,94(4):665-688.
[41]WILSON M. Constructing Measures:An Item Response Modeling Approach[M]. New York,USA:Routledge,2004.
[42]WILSON M. The structured constructs models(SCM):A family of statistical models related to learning progressions[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 Learning Progressions in Science(LeaPS)Conference. Iowa City,USA:LeaPS,2009.
[43]WILSON M. Measuring progressions:Assessment structures underlying a learning progression[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2009,46(6):716-730.
[44]SHIN N,STEVENS S Y,SHORT H,et al. Learning progressions to support coherence curricula in instructional material,instruction,and assessment design[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 Learning Progressions in Science(LeaPS)Conference. Iowa City,USA:LeaPS,2009.
[45]STEVENS S Y,SHIN N,KRAJCIK J S. Towards a model for the development of an empirically tested learning progression[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 Learning Progressions in Science(LeaPS)Conference. Iowa City,USA:LeaPS,2009.
[46]SALINAS I. Learning progressions in science education:Two approaches for development[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 Learning Progressions in Science(LeaPS)Conference. Iowa City,USA:LeaPS,2009.
[47]RUPP A A,CHOI Y,GUSHTA M,et al. Modeling learning progressions in epistemic games with epistemic network analysis:Principles for data analysis and generation[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 Learning Progressions in Science(LeaPS)Conference. Iowa City,USA:LeaPS,2009.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2025-03-15